
Okay, I figured that title would garner some interest. Let's see who bites ...
The following is an excerpt from a piece I wrote a year or two ago, alluding to the connection between what has come to be known as the "neo-prohibitionist" movement and a popular form of Biblical interpretation in the modern church called "dispensationalism." Read it and share your thoughts. Feel free to disagree, but back up your claims to the contrary.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I understand the theology that drives many Evangelicals, and many Baptists specifically, to reject the use of alcohol even in moderation. Their roots pre-date Prohibition, but the spirit that sparked Prohibition is the same one that plagues much of the Church today. Dispensationalists, as many, many modern Evangelicals are, believe that we are at an epoch in history where the Church writ-large is under attack and poised for increased persecution and, dare I say, isolation as a result. This theology, popularized by the "end-times" prognosticators like Hal Lindsey and Tim LaHay, to name just two, paint a picture of the world moving imminently toward a violent end. According to their theology, the Church (i.e., true believers) will be "raptured" out of this tribulation at some point along the way (we won't go into the fine points of tribulationist thought here ...this is still a beer blog). The bottom line, though, is that many of these folks believe that beer (and alcohol in general) is just one of many tools that the Devil will use to entice Christians away from a life of faith. As the world continues to degrade, in their view, Christians need to be all the more diligent in guarding themselves against any obvious affiliation with "the world."
Beer is worldly, Worldly is bad. Ergo, beer is bad.
A pretty pessimistic view of the future, huh? Sadly, this is what a startling portion of the Evangelical Church believes today. Sensationalism sells. So, by rising up against things like moderate alcohol use, they are being true to their own convictions and true to what they're encouraged to believe is Biblical. This, I contend, is a sincere motivation. The trouble is ... I also believe it is sincerely wrong. I don't mean to sound overly harsh toward Evangelicals, or their questionable interpretation of portions of Scripture, but I am genuinely troubled by this sort of news. So many Church leaders are robbing their parishioners of their (literally) God-given liberties, often unknowingly.
Those of us who are Christians of a more historic (and, I'd argue, Biblical) bent are wont to cry out "wait, we don't all believe this stuff!" in an effort to do some sort of damage control for the "rest of us." At the end of the day, though, I don't know that this will do a lot of good. The only thing that will bring to truth of the matter to light is time, really. Something many don't believe we have.
Maybe when the latest end-times novel is forgotten, or revised because they got the predictions wrong again, some Christians will start to question the veracity of this kind of thought. Until then, however, I will continue to educate by example.
The reader can decide which of these attitudes is more "Christian."
Tags: Beer and Christianity, dispensationalism, religion